![]() |
WordExplain God's Answers for Man's Questions |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A Biblical Theology
of Repentance Matthew
3:2. 1Now
in those days John the Baptist came*, preaching
in the wilderness of
Judea, saying, 2“Repent, for the
kingdom of heaven is at hand.” John was
commanding the people of Israel continually to be changing their minds
in view
of the fact that the kingdom of the heavens had drawn near to them in a
spatial
sense. Presumably, if the kingdom of the heavens was near his Judean
listeners,
the King of the kingdom was also near. Matthew (3:3)
identified John as the one Isaiah the prophet referred to in Isaiah
40:3, “The voice of one crying in the wilderness, ‘Make ready
the way of
the LORD, make His paths straight.’” Whether or not John’s listeners
made this
connection is uncertain, but certainly Matthew did. In any event, many
people
in Judea were deeply moved by John’s message, and they were being
baptized by him
in the Jordan River, openly confessing their sins (Matt.
3:6). Changing
their minds (metanoeo) in
preparation
for the kingdom that had approached them from the heavens included
first,
anticipation of the King, second, spiritual cleansing to qualify for
participation in His kingdom. It is worth noting that John perceived
that many
of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism were insincere. He
called
them a “brood of vipers,” and wondered who had secretly warned them to
flee
from the coming wrath! He commanded them to bear fruit worthy of a
change of
mind (metanoia, 3341).
[As it
turned out, most of these Pharisees and Sadducees were unregenerate, as
their
subsequent rejection and crucifixion of Jesus demonstrated.] He warned
them not
to reply upon the fact that they were physical descendants of Abraham,
for
judgment was already approaching! (Matt.
3:7-10). Moreover, he warned of One mightier than he who was
coming. The
mightier One would baptize with superior baptisms, that of the Holy
Spirit and
of fire. His Spirit-baptism would place respondents (wheat) in God’s
granary of
salvation, but His fire-baptism would burn rejecters (chaff) with
unquenchable
fire, a tacit reference to gehenna
(hell) (Matt.
3:11-12)! Matthew
4:17. 17From
that time Jesus began to preach and say, “Repent, for the
kingdom of heaven is at hand.” It should be observed
that, since giving an account of John’s baptism and preaching at the
Jordan,
Matthew recorded four other note-worthy events: (1) Jesus had also come
to be
baptized by John in order “to fulfill all righteousness.” At the same
time, God
had anointed Him with His Spirit, thus denoting Jesus not only as His
Beloved
Son, but as His Messianic, Davidic King (Matt.
3:13-17). (2) Jesus successfully passed His Spirit-induced
temptation by
Satan during a forty-day fast in the wilderness (Matt.
4:1-11). (3) John had been arrested and was removed from his
preaching
ministry (Matt.
4:12). (4) Jesus left Judea and moved to Galilee (Matt.
4:12-16), settling in Capernaum, by the sea, in the region of
Zebulun and
Naphtali. This, Matthew recorded, was deliberate, and fulfilled the
prophecy of
Isaiah (9:1-2),
in which the prophet had predicted a glorious future for the land of
Zebulun
and Naphtali, near the sea, Galilee of the Gentiles. Isaiah,
interpreted by
Matthew, had accurately predicted the region of Messiah’s ministry (Matt.
4:12-15) and the impact of Messiah’s ministry – glory (Isa.
9:1) and the dawning of great light for those sitting in
darkness and the
shadow of death (Isa.
9:2; Matt. 4:16). It was from that point and with that
background that
Jesus began to announce and to command, “Have a change of mind, because
the
kingdom of the heavens has drawn near (to you in the Person and
Presence of the
King!) (Matt.
4:17). So
in context, the change of mind Jesus commanded (metanoeo)
had to do with perceiving the glorious dawning of new light for those
who had
previously experienced contempt (Isa.
9:1), and who were presently sitting in darkness and the
shadow of death.
So the change of mind Jesus was promoting covered three factors: (a)
The kingdom
from the heavens had drawn near to them; (b) they should respond
appropriately
to the King (obviously Himself); and (c) His presence heralded and
constituted
the dawn of a great light of life for them, for they were experiencing
death!
It should be noted that, though Jesus would later certainly talk about
sin (see
Matthew 5-7), this initial change of mind does not mention sin. Matthew 11:20-21. 20Then He began to denounce the cities in which most of His miracles were done, because they did not repent. 21“Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the miracles had occurred in Tyre and Sidon which occurred in you, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes. Unfortunately, we English speakers are so conditioned to connect sin with the word repent that we assume Jesus condemned Chorazin and Bethsaida because they did not repent of their sin. But I do not believe that is primarily what Jesus had in mind. Much time has elapsed during Jesus’ ministry as recorded in Matthew 4-11. It is true that Jesus certainly emphasized the appropriate behavior necessary to participate in the kingdom of the heavens (Matt. 5-7). But Matthew summarized Jesus’ ministry in brief statements such as those found in Matthew 4:22-25; 8:16-17; 9:35-38; 10:1-8; 11:1; 11:2-6. It is clear that through His ministry, Jesus was searching for those who would recognize Him as the Messiah He was, accepting Him by faith. Most egregious in their rejection of Him were the Pharisees and other leaders, who not only rejected Him as the Messiah, but stated that He cast out demons by the power of Satan (Matt. 9:34; 10:25; 12:22-32). It would appear that Jesus pronounced woe upon Chorazin and Bethsaida because, despite all the miracles performed among them, they still did not believe He was the Messiah! From this they needed to change their mind. Had Jesus performed these miracles in the Gentile cities of Tyre and Sidon, they would have changed their mind about him in sackcloth and ashes long ago. In other words, the people of the Gentile cities would have been appalled at their neglect of Jesus and would have placed their confidence in Him! Matthew
12:41. 41“The
men of Nineveh will stand up with this generation at the judgment, and
will
condemn it because they repented
at
the preaching of Jonah; and behold, something greater than Jonah is
here." A
superficial assessment might lead one to conclude that metanoeo
has to do with a change of mind about evil. And a good case can be made
for
that conclusion. When Jonah had cried out that the city of Nineveh
would be
overthrown in forty days, the king of Nineveh issued a proclamation
that included
the following words, 8“But both man and beast
must be covered with
sackcloth; and let men call on God earnestly that each may turn from
his wicked
way and from the violence which is in his hands. 9Who
knows,
God may turn and relent and withdraw His burning anger so that we will
not
perish” (Jonah
3:8-9). But that is not the end of the story, either in the
book of Jonah
or in the gospel of Matthew. After Jonah cried out, “Yet forty days and
Nineveh
will be overthrown” (Jonah
3:4), the text reads immediately, 5““Then
the people
of Nineveh believed in God; and they called a fast and put on sackcloth
from
the greatest to the least of them” (Jonah
3:5). So we can conclude two things from the account
in Jonah: (1) The
people changed their minds about continuing in their “evil way” and
“violence”
because they believed in God. (2) The people changed their minds about
their
“evil way” and “violence” because they believed in Jonah. Let’s see if
anything
of the kind exists in Matthew
12. In
the extended context of Matthew
12, (a) “the Pharisees” accused Jesus’ disciples of breaking
the Sabbath by
picking heads of grain, shelling them by hand, and then eating them as
they
passed through a field (Matt.
12:1-8). (b) Jesus left and entered their synagogue,
apparently on the
Sabbath. Jesus healed a man with a withered hand on there on the
Sabbath. But
the Pharisees left, seeking a way to kill Jesus (Matt.
12:9-14). (c) Jesus healed a demon-possessed man who was
blind and mute. The
amazed crowds were all but willing to assign to Jesus Messianic status.
Unable
to deny the factuality of the miraculous sign, the Pharisees, however,
completely distorted the miracle. They asserted, apparently not in
Jesus’ presence,
that he was able to cast out demons only by the power of Beelzebul, the
ruler
of the demons. Jesus, aware of their thoughts, pointed out the
absurdity of
their conclusion, and then concluded that they had committed the
unpardonable
sin by attributing Jesus’ power source to the devil instead of to the
Holy
Spirit (Matt.
12:22-32). They would be judged by their words (Matt.
12:33-37). Unbelievably,
some of the scribes and Pharisees then requested a sign from Jesus! The
immediate
context of Matthew
12:41 reads as follows (Matt.
12:38-42): 38Then some of the
scribes and Pharisees
said to Him, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from You.” 39But
He
answered and said to them, “An evil and adulterous generation
craves for a
sign; and yet no sign will be given to it
but the sign of Jonah the
prophet; 40for just as Jonah
was three days and three
nights in the belly of the sea monster, so will the Son of Man be three
days
and three nights in the heart of the earth. 41“The
men of
Nineveh will stand up with this generation at the judgment, and will
condemn it
because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and behold, something
greater
than Jonah is here. 42“The
Queen of the
South will rise up with this generation at the judgment and will
condemn it,
because she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of
Solomon; and
behold, something greater than Solomon is here. The scribes and Pharisees were requesting a miraculous sign presumably sufficient enough to induce them to believe in Jesus as their Messiah. But in view of their complete rejection of Him, Jesus refused any signs for “an evil and adulterous generation” except for the sign of His burial and subsequent resurrection – which He called the sign of the prophet Jonah. The people of Nineveh had changed their mind about God and Jonah, and had believed both, responding by changing their mind and behavior about their sins. The Queen of the South came from afar because she gave credence to the wisdom of Solomon. But both the people of Nineveh and the Queen of the South would stand in judgment upon Israel and her leaders because someone far greater than either Jonah or Solomon had come, but they had not believed He was the Messiah! They had totally rejected Him, (and in fact, would conspire to crucify Him)! So though in a narrower context, the change of mind of the people of Nineveh incorporated a change of mind about sin, the larger context was about faith in the prophet and faith in God. Jesus implied that the people of Israel needed to change their mind. About what? About Him! They needed to trust in Him – to acknowledge Him as their Messiah. This they were, for the most part, totally unwilling to do. |
|