![]() |
Pneumatology
The Study of the Holy Spirit by WordExplain |
"For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit." 1 Corinthians 12:13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
G. Is speaking in tongues a necessary sign of the
Baptism of the Spirit? 1. We have already discovered that, in the
instances of the Baptism of the Spirit as recorded in the book of Acts, speaking in
tongues was not a necessary sign of salvation. A score or more of conversions to Christ were
listed without any explicit reference to speaking in tongues. 2. We can demonstrate summarily from 1
Corinthians 12 that speaking in tongues is not a necessary
sign of the Baptism
of the Spirit. 3. We have learned that all believers have been
baptized by the Spirit into the Body
of Christ (1 Cor.
12:13). We
have also seen that, by virtue of their having been Baptized
by the Spirit, each believer has also imbibed the Holy Spirit as an
indwelling presence (1 Cor.
12:13). 4. If we jump to the end of 1
Corinthians 12, we discover that Paul enumerated different
spiritually gifted individuals and different spiritual gifts. He stated, “And God has appointed in the
church, first apostles, second prophets,
third teachers …” (1 Cor.
12:28). These
first three are gifted individuals, evidently recorded in order of
importance. Paul next proceeded to list
spiritual gifts of lesser importance:
“then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, various
kinds of tongues” (1 Cor.
12:28). Then,
beginning in 1 Cor.
12:29, Paul asked a series of rhetorical questions,
the expected answer to each of which would be, “No.” He asked, “All are not apostles are
they?” [The anticipated answer is,
“No.”] “All are not prophets, are they?” [The anticipated answer is, “No.”] “All are not teachers, are they? [The anticipated answer is, “No.”] “All are not workers of miracles, are
they? [The anticipated answer is,
“No.”] Paul continued in 1 Cor.
12:30, “All do not have gifts of healings, do
they?” [The anticipated answer is,
“No.”] “All do not speak with tongues,
do they?” [The anticipated answer is,
“No.”] “All do not interpret, do they?” [The anticipated answer is, “No.”] 5. So here we have proof positive from the Apostle
Paul that all Christians have been baptized
by the Spirit into the Body
of Christ, but that not all
Christians speak in tongues. Therefore
it can be deduced logically that speaking in tongues is NOT an obligatory sign
of the baptism
of the Spirit throughout the Church Age, though it
was a sign on three occasions early in the history of the Church in the first
century A.D. (See the chart on
the three instances of speaking in tongues in the book of Acts.) Go to a Chart of Speaking in Tongues in the Book of Acts
The Significance of Speaking in Tongues Part G: Is Speaking in Tongues a Necessary Sign of the Baptism of the Spirit? Prepared by
James T. Bartsch April, 2009 Published
Online by WordExplain Email Contact: jbartsch@wordexplain.com This study is based on, and the links to Scripture reference the NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE ®, Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by the Lockman Foundation. (www.Lockman.org) (Scripture
quotations taken from the NASB.
Used by Permission.)
Updated November 8, 2010
|